Semidirect product

Definition a remarks

We start with a proposition:

Proposition

Let $G$ be a group, $N$ a normal subgroup and $H$ a subgroup. The following are equivalent:

1. There exists a group homomorphism $\phi: G \rightarrow H$ such that $\phi|_H=id$ and $\mbox{Ker}(\phi)=N.$

2. It is satisfied that $G=NH$ and $H\cap N=\{e\}.$

When any of those requirements is satisfied we write

$$ G=N\rtimes H $$

$\blacksquare$

Definition

When we have the context given by condition 1 or 2 we say that $G$ is the semidirect product of $N$ and $H$ and we write $G=N \rtimes H$.

$\blacksquare$

Remarks

$$ NH=\{nh: n\in N, h\in H\}. $$

Image from Mathematics for Physics, an ilustrated handbook, page 40.

Proof

$\blacksquare$

The product in $G$

The product in $G$ takes a special form: given $g=(n,h)$ and $g'=(n',h')$ then $gg'=(\bar{n},\bar{h})$ and

$$ \bar{n}\bar{h}=nhn'h'=nhn'h^{-1}hh' $$

therefore

$$ \bar{h}=hh' $$ $$ \bar{n}=nhn'h^{-1} $$

We can think in $N$ as translations and $H$ as rotations.

Key example

Suppose the group $E(2)$ of isometries of the euclidean plane, or rigid motions. It is known that any element of $E(2)$ can be seen as the composition of a translation (an element of $\mathbb{R}^2$) and a linear isometry (an element of $O(2)$, that is, a rotation with centre at the origin or a reflection with axis through the origin). This decomposition is unique.

Moreover, translations are a normal subgroup of $E(2)$: you can see it intuitively "moving things on a table" or by computation:

$$ v\mapsto R(R^{-1}v+t)=R R^{-1}v+Rt=v+Rt $$

Therefore

$$ E(2)=\mathbb{R}^2 \rtimes O(2). $$

In general, if we now consider any subgroup $H$ of $GL(n)$ we can consider the subgroup $G$ of $GL(n+1)$

$$ G=\left\{\begin{pmatrix} B & v\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix}:B\in H, v\in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $$

It is easy to show that $G$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n \rtimes H$ (construct the map $\phi$ of the definition).

Conversely, given any group $G=N\rtimes H$, with $N\approx \mathbb{R}^n$ and $H\approx \tilde{H}\leq GL(n)$, it can be shown that $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $GL(n+1)$ of this form. Consider

$$ \bar{N}=\left\{\begin{pmatrix} I & v\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix}:v\in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $$

and

$$ \bar{H}=\left\{\begin{pmatrix} B & 0\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix}:B\in \tilde{H}\right\} $$

Now it is easy to see that $G$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $GL(n+1)$ with the form above by means of the map:

$$ \varphi: G=N\rtimes H \to\bar{N}\times\bar{H} \to GL(n+1) $$ $$ (n,h)\mapsto \left(\begin{pmatrix} I & v\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix},\begin{pmatrix} B & 0\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix}\right) \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} B & v\\ 0 &1\\ \end{pmatrix} $$

This map is a homomorphism. The product in $G$ takes the form

$$ (n,h)(n',h')=(nhn'h^{-1},hh') $$

and with a standard computation can be checked that

$$ \varphi((n,h))\cdot \varphi((n',h'))=\varphi((nhn'h^{-1},hh')) $$

Moreover, the map is also injective, as it is easy to check.

Another approach

Within this approach we can create a group being the semidirect product of two given groups.

Definition. Let $H$ and $N$ be groups, and let $\phi: H \rightarrow \text{Aut}(N)$ be a group homomorphism such that $\phi(h)$ defines a group action of $h$ on $N$. The semidirect product $N \rtimes_{\phi} H$ is the Cartesian product $N \times H$ endowed with the multiplication operation

$$ \cdot : (n, h) \cdot (n', h') = (n \phi(h)(n'), hh') \quad \forall n, n' \in N, \, h, h' \in H, $$

where $\phi(h)(n')$ denotes the action of $h$ on $n'$.$\blacksquare$

It can be shown that it is indeed a group.

About the Lie algebras

I think it can be proven the following proposition

Proposition

Let $G$ be a Lie group that is the semidirect product of a normal subgroup $N$ and a subgroup $H$, i.e., $G = N \rtimes H$. Then the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of $G$ has a canonical decomposition as an $Ad(H)$-module given by

$$ \mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{n} \oplus \mathfrak{h}, $$

where $\mathfrak{n}$ and $\mathfrak{h}$ are the Lie algebras of the subgroups $N$ and $H$, respectively.$\blacksquare$

Proof

The idea is:

$\blacksquare$

________________________________________

________________________________________

________________________________________

Author of the notes: Antonio J. Pan-Collantes

antonio.pan@uca.es


INDEX: